Ergo Reader
Virtue and the Mean
← Essential Passages

Book II · 1106b–1107a · 2 min

Virtue and the Mean

From The Nicomachean Ethics by Aristotle

Before you read

Moral virtue aims at what is appropriate between excess and deficiency, but Aristotle is not recommending bland moderation or a numerical average. The mean is relative to the person and situation, determined by reason and practical wisdom. Hitting it is difficult because failure is possible in many directions.

Framing by Ergo. The passage below is unchanged from the attributed translation.

Virtue and the Mean

If it is thus, then, that every art does its work well—by looking to the intermediate and judging its works by this standard 10 (so that we often say of good works of art that it is not possible either to take away or to add anything, implying that excess and defect destroy the goodness of works of art, while the mean preserves it; and good artists, as we say, look to this in their work), and if, further, virtue is more exact and better than any art, as nature also is, 15 then virtue must have the quality of aiming at the intermediate. I mean moral virtue; for it is this that is concerned with passions and actions, and in these there is excess, defect, and the intermediate. For instance, both fear and confidence and appetite and anger and pity and in general pleasure and pain may be felt both too much and too little, and in both cases not well; 20 but to feel them at the right times, with reference to the right objects, towards the right people, with the right motive, and in the right way, is what is both intermediate and best, and this is characteristic of virtue. Similarly with regard to actions also there is excess, defect, and the intermediate. Now virtue is concerned with passions and actions, 25 in which excess is a form of failure, and so is defect, while the intermediate is praised and is a form of success; and being praised and being successful are both characteristics of virtue. Therefore virtue is a kind of mean, since, as we have seen, it aims at what is intermediate.

Again, it is possible to fail in many ways (for evil belongs to the class of the unlimited, as the Pythagoreans conjectured, and good to that of the limited), 30 while to succeed is possible, only in one way (for which reason also one is easy and the other difficult—to miss the mark easy, to hit it difficult); for these reasons also, then, excess and defect are characteristic of vice, and the mean of virtue;

35 For men are good in but one way, but bad in many.[12]

Virtue, then, is a state of character concerned with choice, lying in a mean, 1107a i.e. the mean relative to us, this being determined by a rational principle, and by that principle by which the man of practical wisdom would determine it. Now it is a mean between two vices, that which depends on excess and that which depends on defect; and again it is a mean because the vices respectively fall short of or exceed what is right in both passions and actions, 5 while virtue both finds and chooses that which is intermediate. Hence in respect of its substance and the definition which states its essence virtue is a mean, with regard to what is best and right an extreme.